<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The fun of dealing with bandwidth vendors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/</link>
	<description>A blog for IT Admins who do everything by an IT Admin who does everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>In my somewhat abbreviated career, I&#039;ve realized that service providers are the absolute worst and getting anything done in a timely matter.  They all seem to have incredibly screwed up business processes and have no uniformity.  What I mean by that is, it seems like no department or work group has any idea what another department or work group does.  It took me 2 months to get Level 3 to change some 911 location information on 3 POTS lines.  Three!  If I call them to ask about a phone number or PRI circuit, they have to go into the &quot;switch programing&quot; to pull the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my somewhat abbreviated career, I&#8217;ve realized that service providers are the absolute worst and getting anything done in a timely matter.  They all seem to have incredibly screwed up business processes and have no uniformity.  What I mean by that is, it seems like no department or work group has any idea what another department or work group does.  It took me 2 months to get Level 3 to change some 911 location information on 3 POTS lines.  Three!  If I call them to ask about a phone number or PRI circuit, they have to go into the &#8220;switch programing&#8221; to pull the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>You have it in writing, missed appointments will result in a Missed Appointment charge of $195.00.  I&#039;m assuming you copy and pasted directly from the email.  No where does it state which party is subject to the charge.  I say send them a bill for $195.00 for missing the appointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have it in writing, missed appointments will result in a Missed Appointment charge of $195.00.  I&#8217;m assuming you copy and pasted directly from the email.  No where does it state which party is subject to the charge.  I say send them a bill for $195.00 for missing the appointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Schumacher</title>
		<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-3890</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Schumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-3890</guid>
		<description>I stand by my claim that true customer service is a lost art.  

And markets where there is one service provider and you can&#039;t easily go to a competitor are a roadmap to misery. If there were another vendor competing with Verizon for your business, there is no way Verizon would be so disrespectful of you, their customer.  If only you could somehow charge Verizon $195 (or better yet some hourly rate) for their missing an appointment they made.

I feel your pain my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand by my claim that true customer service is a lost art.  </p>
<p>And markets where there is one service provider and you can&#8217;t easily go to a competitor are a roadmap to misery. If there were another vendor competing with Verizon for your business, there is no way Verizon would be so disrespectful of you, their customer.  If only you could somehow charge Verizon $195 (or better yet some hourly rate) for their missing an appointment they made.</p>
<p>I feel your pain my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidNolan</title>
		<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-3889</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidNolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-3889</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never had Verizon try to charge us a $195 fee for missing the install.  But I&#039;m not in New York, so that may be a local policy.

Here in Pittsburgh, Verizon tends to show up an-announced.  &quot;We&#039;re here to do the install!&quot;  We&#039;ve had to turn them away at least once because building management requires 24 hours notice for non-emergency access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never had Verizon try to charge us a $195 fee for missing the install.  But I&#8217;m not in New York, so that may be a local policy.</p>
<p>Here in Pittsburgh, Verizon tends to show up an-announced.  &#8220;We&#8217;re here to do the install!&#8221;  We&#8217;ve had to turn them away at least once because building management requires 24 hours notice for non-emergency access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charleshooper</title>
		<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-3887</link>
		<dc:creator>charleshooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-3887</guid>
		<description>I had a similar experience with Verizon at a previous job. Our T1 (provided and managed by some other company) went down hard. Despite our SLA with the other people, it was a physical, off-site wiring problem and Verizon wasn&#039;t able to get a tech out for 6 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar experience with Verizon at a previous job. Our T1 (provided and managed by some other company) went down hard. Despite our SLA with the other people, it was a physical, off-site wiring problem and Verizon wasn&#8217;t able to get a tech out for 6 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/02/the-fun-of-dealing-with-bandwidth-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>You should charge them $195 for missing the appointment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should charge them $195 for missing the appointment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
